US Supreme Court OKs Obama's Health Care Plan
VOA News
June 28, 2012
The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Barack Obama a major victory Thursday, upholding the key part of his controversial health care plan in a 5-4 decision.
The so-called "individual mandate" requires Americans to have health insurance or face a financial penalty. U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the court's more liberal justices, writing in his majority opinion that "because the Constitution permits such a tax, it is not [the court's] role to forbid it, or to pass [decide] upon its wisdom or fairness.''
Facts About The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly known as “Obamacare”
Individual mandate requiring all U.S. citizens to have health insurance either through private companies, their employers, or state-sponsored exchanges. Failure to do so will result in a fine.
Insurance companies banned from denying coverage to applicants with pre-existing health conditions.
Insurance companies required to include preventative health care at no extra cost, banned from setting limits on payouts for coverage.
Companies employing over 50 people required to provide those employees with health insurance.
Children allowed to stay on their parents’ insurance plans until 26 years of age.
Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor voted with Roberts to uphold the law.
President Barack Obama hailed the ruling as a victory "for people all over this country whose lives will be more secure because of this law and the Supreme Court's decision to uphold it." He also said the court decision reaffirmed that in the United States, the wealthiest nation on Earth, that no illness or accident should lead any family to financial ruin.
Obama's expected challenger in the 2012 election, Republican Mitt Romney, promised to repeal the law on his first day in office, if elected. He said, "Obamacare was bad policy yesterday. It's bad policy today," and warned the law will cause up to 20 million Americans to lose health care coverage they like or want to keep while also killing badly needed jobs.
The Obama administration had argued the "individual mandate" is valid under the U.S. Constitution because all Americans will need medical care at some point in their lives, and there is no practical alternative to insurance.
Twenty-six states filed suit against the reform law, contending that individuals cannot be forced to buy insurance, a product they may neither want nor need.
U.S. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell Thursday criticized the Supreme Court ruling and the health care plan. He said the law the Obama administration pushed through Congress "made the problems it was meant to solve even worse - the supposed cure has proven to be worse than the disease."
House Majority Leader Republican Eric Cantor told reporters he has scheduled a House vote on July 11 on whether to repeal the health care law.
Nancy Pelosi, the top Democrat in the House, said the court ruling is a victory for the American people because it "ensured health care would be a right for all, not a privilege for the few."
The U.S. business community is also speaking out.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue said his pro-business group still feels the health care law is fundamentally flawed. If it is left unchanged, he said, "it will cost many Americans their employer-based health insurance, undermine job creation, and raise health care costs for all."
Thursday's decision drew a large and energetic crowd to the steps of the Supreme Court, with students, parents, priests and even some belly dancers anxiously awaiting the decision. But the ruling - a complex look at the constitutionality of the Obama health care law - sparked confusion. Many in the crowd - and some in the news media - were at first not clear about what the decision meant.
The law passed in early 2010 is the signature piece of President Obama's legislative agenda during his time in office. It is intended to address rising health care costs and the financial problems many Americans have faced in trying to obtain health insurance.
fuente: La Voz de América, http://www.voanews.com/content/breaking-news-us-supreme-court-health-care-decision/1264278.html
June 28, 2012
The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Barack Obama a major victory Thursday, upholding the key part of his controversial health care plan in a 5-4 decision.
The so-called "individual mandate" requires Americans to have health insurance or face a financial penalty. U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the court's more liberal justices, writing in his majority opinion that "because the Constitution permits such a tax, it is not [the court's] role to forbid it, or to pass [decide] upon its wisdom or fairness.''
Facts About The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly known as “Obamacare”
Individual mandate requiring all U.S. citizens to have health insurance either through private companies, their employers, or state-sponsored exchanges. Failure to do so will result in a fine.
Insurance companies banned from denying coverage to applicants with pre-existing health conditions.
Insurance companies required to include preventative health care at no extra cost, banned from setting limits on payouts for coverage.
Companies employing over 50 people required to provide those employees with health insurance.
Children allowed to stay on their parents’ insurance plans until 26 years of age.
Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor voted with Roberts to uphold the law.
President Barack Obama hailed the ruling as a victory "for people all over this country whose lives will be more secure because of this law and the Supreme Court's decision to uphold it." He also said the court decision reaffirmed that in the United States, the wealthiest nation on Earth, that no illness or accident should lead any family to financial ruin.
Obama's expected challenger in the 2012 election, Republican Mitt Romney, promised to repeal the law on his first day in office, if elected. He said, "Obamacare was bad policy yesterday. It's bad policy today," and warned the law will cause up to 20 million Americans to lose health care coverage they like or want to keep while also killing badly needed jobs.
The Obama administration had argued the "individual mandate" is valid under the U.S. Constitution because all Americans will need medical care at some point in their lives, and there is no practical alternative to insurance.
Twenty-six states filed suit against the reform law, contending that individuals cannot be forced to buy insurance, a product they may neither want nor need.
U.S. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell Thursday criticized the Supreme Court ruling and the health care plan. He said the law the Obama administration pushed through Congress "made the problems it was meant to solve even worse - the supposed cure has proven to be worse than the disease."
House Majority Leader Republican Eric Cantor told reporters he has scheduled a House vote on July 11 on whether to repeal the health care law.
Nancy Pelosi, the top Democrat in the House, said the court ruling is a victory for the American people because it "ensured health care would be a right for all, not a privilege for the few."
The U.S. business community is also speaking out.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue said his pro-business group still feels the health care law is fundamentally flawed. If it is left unchanged, he said, "it will cost many Americans their employer-based health insurance, undermine job creation, and raise health care costs for all."
Thursday's decision drew a large and energetic crowd to the steps of the Supreme Court, with students, parents, priests and even some belly dancers anxiously awaiting the decision. But the ruling - a complex look at the constitutionality of the Obama health care law - sparked confusion. Many in the crowd - and some in the news media - were at first not clear about what the decision meant.
The law passed in early 2010 is the signature piece of President Obama's legislative agenda during his time in office. It is intended to address rising health care costs and the financial problems many Americans have faced in trying to obtain health insurance.
fuente: La Voz de América, http://www.voanews.com/content/breaking-news-us-supreme-court-health-care-decision/1264278.html
Comentarios